Lawful collection
Research is limited to lawful sources and authorised investigative activity.
The Drishti Investigation Standard
A structured methodology for lawful public-source investigation, source provenance, evidence preservation, transparent assessment, and defensible reporting.
Research is limited to lawful sources and authorised investigative activity.
Material findings retain traceability to where the underlying information came from.
Important source material can be preserved with retrieval context so later assessments remain auditable.
Official records, primary sources, credible reporting, and secondary material are not treated as equally authoritative.
Information can become stale. Material findings should be assessed against when the evidence was published or retrieved.
Conflicting evidence is surfaced rather than silently collapsed into a convenient conclusion.
Reports identify evidence, assessment, confidence, limitations, and unresolved questions.
Assessment language
Directly supported by traceable evidence.
A reasoned interpretation based on established evidence.
A proposition that still requires additional evidence or testing.
A material point that available evidence cannot presently establish.
Core principle
Search results are discovery. AI output is analysis assistance. Neither is evidence by itself.
A useful investigation must be able to show what supports an important claim, where that material came from, how current it is, and where uncertainty remains.
Boundaries
Public-source intelligence is not a licence to intrude into private systems, accounts, or personal lives.
Unauthorised access to systems, accounts, or devices
Credential harvesting or password acquisition
Private-account intrusion
Doxxing or unnecessary exposure of personal information
Unlawful surveillance or tracking
Presenting speculation or AI-generated text as verified evidence
Start with the question you need answered and the decision the research is intended to support.